Peter Navarro’s recent comments accusing Indian “Brahmins” of profiteering in the context of the SCO Summit sparked significant backlash, particularly after his remarks on India’s oil trade and diplomacy circulated via the news show "Vantage with Palki Sharma" from Firstpost.
Navarro's
Controversial Statement
- Caste Remark: Navarro, Trump’s former trade
adviser, said, “You’ve got Brahmins profiteering at the expense of the
Indian people. We need that to stop,” while criticizing India’s ties with
Russia and China at the summit.
- Context: His remarks came after photos of Narendra Modi, Vladimir
Putin, and Xi Jinping enjoying friendly moments at the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit went viral, drawing attention to
India’s continued trade and diplomatic engagement with Russia despite
American criticism.
- Reaction: The caste-based accusation was
widely viewed as a dog whistle and a deliberate attempt to paint India as
feudal and corrupt, ignoring real facts about India’s oil trade, global
market stability, and adherence to international norms.
Analysis by Vantage
with Palki Sharma
- Fact-Check: The show debunked Navarro’s claims,
explaining that India’s purchases of Russian oil help stabilize global
prices and also supply Ukraine’s energy needs, exposing the hypocrisy of
Western criticism since the US and Europe continue to trade with Russia as
well.
- India’s Position: India was lauded for transparent and
compliant energy transactions, with the government reaffirming it has not
broken any rules and will not abandon Russian oil just because US views
have shifted.
- Diplomatic Takeaways: The summit highlighted India's
pursuit of “sovereignty first” in connectivity projects and a pragmatic
multi-aligned foreign policy—fostering ties with Russia, China, and
Central Asia, navigating US tariffs, and countering Pakistan on terrorism.
Regional and Global
Impact
- Summit Outcomes: India secured international
condemnation of the recent Pahelgam attack (targeting Pakistan’s
cross-border terror), initiated a cautious diplomatic reset with China,
and showcased its alternative trade vision against American and Chinese
models.
- Backlash: Navarro’s remarks triggered
criticism from Indian media and social commentators, reinforcing India's
stance on acting independently and challenging stereotypes.
Peter Navarro’s
“Brahmins” remark was strongly rejected and dissected by the Indian media, with
Vantage host Palki Sharma emphasizing the flawed logic and double standards
behind such rhetoric.
0 Comments
premkumar.raja@gmail.com